Monthly Archives: January 2012

HerStoryCalls welcomes Emma Leigh Reed

Emma Leigh Reed has lived in New Hampshire all her life. She has fond memories of the Maine coastline and incorporates the ocean into all her books. She lives in a small town with her husband and three children. Her life has been touched and changed by her son’s autism – she views life through a very different lens than before he was born. Growing up as an avid reader, it was only natural for Emma Leigh to turn to creating the stories for others to enjoy.

Where did you get your inspiration for Crashing Hearts? My inspiration for this story came from my son who is autistic.  Originally I wanted to write his story, but it was still too painful so I choose to weave his story into a contemporary romance.

Who are the characters in Crashing Hearts?  Kira Nichols, mom to autistic son, Jared.  Grant Rutledge, contractor.

What is your writing process? I’m a panster.  I tried to have a loose plot with Crashing Hearts, but Kira and Grant decided the story was going to go in a different direction.

How long was your Journey to publication?  I started writing and finished the first draft in seven months.  Lots of revisions and learning the craft before three years later it was bought by Whiskey Creek Press.

Do you have any advice for authors and aspiring authors? Keep writing even when you feel you can’t.  Write something.  Keep the creative juices flowing.

Did you ever enter any contests?  What are your thoughts on writing contests?  The first contest I entered, The Lone Star, I placed third with Crashing Hearts. I have entered a couple others, but never placed.  I think contests are great, as long as you take little stock in the feedback.  I have had scores ranging from terrible to great on the same story.  Feedback to tell me it was great, to saying they just didn’t get it.  Stay true to your voice and don’t let judge feedback influence major changes.

Now that Crashing Hearts released, what is next for you?  What projects are you working on now? I have a romantic suspense, Mirrored Deception, just about ready for submission – goal to have it submitted is February 1st.   I also have another untitled story (another romantic suspense) about a quarter of the way finished.

Thank you for being with us today!

www.emmaleighreed.com

Twitter

Facebook

Buy at Amazon (ebook) or print and ebook through Whiskey Creek Press

How hard can it be?

“Defeat is not the worst of failures. Not to have tried is the true failure.”

- George Edward Woodberry

We talked this month about the craft of writing fiction, specifically about starting a novel. We discussed the essentials of what you need to know before you sit down to write.  I certainly didn’t cover all of the craft lessons about starting fiction, but just a few of the basics.

Remember, where you start is important to the success of your story. Which types of opening will most likely catch an editor or an agents eye. I told you the reason why you might want to include a prologue and why you might want to feed the back story in gently in small does later in your novel.

We’ve discussed opening from almost every aspect, and for fiction whether it is a novel, short story or epic, you’ll want your opening to be grand.  The truly grand opening includes the first sentence, the first paragraph and the first chapter which should end with a hook, to keep your reader reading.  Done correctly each aspect of the opening is a hook in and of itself.

I had great difficulty explaining where to start.  I told you to start when something changes, or your characters are presented with a challenge.  I wrote about jumping into the action, in media res which will assure a good pace for your opening.  I also pointed out how hard it is to decide where exactly you story starts.

The most important thing is just starting.  We also talked about stories that come full circle and how your beginning and your end are mirror reflections of each other.  Those same aspects show us what a character learned along the journey. Knowing your end, is just as important as knowing your story goal.

Now this one final piece of advice.  Start the story, and write it through to the end.

No one else can tell the story the same way you do.  If you care enough to start, then finish.  If you don’t try, if you don’t finish, you will never be able to fix it and find out if anyone else has an interest in your story.

To paraphrase, rejection is not  the worst of failures. Not to have tried is the true failure.

HSC Contest Reviews – the SARA Merritt Contest

The SARA Merritt Contest

http://www.sararwa.net/contest.html

Presented by:

San Antonio Romance Authors

Opens for entries:  January 15th

Fees: $25 for SARA members, $30 for other RWA members and $35 for general public

Entry: Opening 25 pages, including a 5 page synopsis

Closed for entries:  February 14th

Contest winners announced at the monthly meeting in May 

OVERVIEW:

Pros:

Good score sheet

3 judges for each entry, lowest of the 3 scores is dropped

Opportunity for finalists to revise entry before going into the final round

Final round judges are industry professional editors

Cons:

A statement on the contest website says they can limit the number of entries

The contest states that it can’t guarantee trained judges

Review:

The Good –

The 2 page score sheet has areas for Opening Hook, Characterization and Plot with a rating from 1-5 on each.  Each section has plenty of room for comments, plus there is room at the bottom for feedback on strengths and areas for improvement.  Nice job!

There are 3 judges for each entry, lowest score dropped.  This is always good so that there are no discrepancy scores.

The Merritt contest lets the finalists have time to revise their entry before the final round.  This is great!  Any room for improving the entry before the editor sees it is fabulous!

Final round judges are all industry professionals.  They are: Contemporary judged by Deb Werksman of Sourcebooks, Historical judged by Tessa Woodward of Avon, Paranormal judged by Amanda Barnett of The Wild Rose Press, Romantic Suspense judged by Patience Bloom of Harlequin and Women’s Fiction judged by Kate Seaver of Berkley.

The Bad –

On the Merritt contest website, it states “We reserve the right to limit the number of entries”.  Any attempt to limit entries only inhibits competition.

On the website there is a statement under Rules and then under Judges that states “SARA will make every effort (but cannot guarantee) to provide experienced and/or trained judges, including at least one published judge per entry”.  They send out a handout with judging guidance to all judges.  Yet, guidance does not replace a trained judge. 

 

As far as the Sara Merritt Contest is concerned, it’s pretty average.  With a $25 ($30 for other RWA members, $35 for general public) entry fee, you get 3 judges with the lowest score dropped and an opportunity for finalists to revise their manuscript before the final round.  However, there is the possibility that your entry could be scored by an untrained judge.

 

DIFFERENT HEROES

 

 

            I’ve found that one of the most interesting, rewarding, and yet frustrating tasks of writing is that of creating heroes, ones that are different and make a difference in the story.

            What am I talking about? Well, there are times, when creating a hero, that I wonder if it is merely a rubber-stamp copy of one I have in another book. At times, it is different to determine whether or not I’ve succeeded in creating very individual heroes. However, there are several ways I’ve found, hopefully, to get around this.

            First of all, I not only give them different descriptions, but also different jobs. A cop, for example, isn’t going to have the same traits as that of a CPA. When I developed my characters for my first mystery, Murder By Mistake, I knew I was going to have a cop hero. After all, my character works at solving a murder because she’s afraid if she tells the truth, he’ll arrest her for the crime. She’s psychic, saw a murder in her apartment, and can give the cops several clues that could lead to his identity. But who would believe she saw a murder and yet wasn’t there? And what would be better than having a hero in direct opposition to the protagonist?

            In order to develop my hero, I had to also decide upon my protagonist’s characteristics. First of all, she would have to be of strong character, willing to take chances that a meeker, perhaps mild person wouldn’t. I, for example, wouldn’t do hardly any of the things she does, even if I were her age. Any bravery I have doesn’t include chasing down murderers, defying cops, and the like. However, I felt she needed more than bravery (or is it foolishness). She would have to be appearing to the hero; otherwise, she’d be looking through bars.

            That meant I had to design a hero that would tend to be a “by the book” cop, and yet be fascinated enough with the protagonist to be willing to “bend.”

            I think I succeeded. However, I then did something totally unexpected and unplanned. I was in the middle of working on a scene when something popped into my head. I needed a way to interpret and make clear some of her psychic visions. So, enter hero number two, a Native American artist, former Special Forces, who also teaches survival and other such things that would have me shaking in my boots. Enter Jack Wolf, who was supposed to “walk on the set” and then “walk off.”

            He refused, is still in the series, and occupies much of the protagonist’s time. Certainly he has some of the characteristics the cop has. After all, he was a member of the Special Forces. But, he’s also a psychic, unless the cop who is very strong about not believing in that. And then, he’s also an artist, perhaps a strange combination, but it does make for some interesting scenes.

            There’s one element that seems to crop up, not only in both these heroes, but the heroes in my other books. They’re all tall, over six feet, with one exception, and that one is 5’11”. I suppose it’s because I tend to prefer tall men in real life, which can create problems as when dancing with one, as I’m not even five feet tall any more. I used to be, but now I’m slightly over 4’9”.

            Why have two heroes, even though they’re different? I really can’t answer that, but do admit I enjoy writing about the juxtaposition of the two, the “sometimes” rivalry, and even the occasional camaraderie. Since this is an ongoing series and not essentially a romance based one, my character doesn’t need to choose between one and the other. Besides, I’ve gotten quite fond of both and don’t want to give up either one.

            As I’ve written this, I’ve decided to take a look at other heroes in some of my other (unpublished) books in order to determine if I’ve succeeded in creating “different” characters, or if they’re too much alike.

            I’d love to hear about some of your experiences when creating heroes, and how you’ve solved some of the problems that arise.

Joan K. Maze

Writing as J. K. Maze

www.joanmaze.com

http://sleuthingwithmollie.wordpress.com

http://homicideandmayhem.wordpress.com

Murder By Mistake, book 1 in the Mollie Fenwick Mystery Series, available as an ebook from Red Rose Publishing, B&N, Fictionwise and Amazon

Murder By Mistake, book 1 in the Mollie Fenwick Mystery Series, available in paperback from Amazon

Murder for Kicks, book 2 in the Mollie Fenwick Mystery Series, available as an ebook from Red Rose Publishing, Fictionwise and Amazon

Framed in Fear, romantic suspense, available from Red Rose Publishing, Fictionwise and Amazon

Murder by Spook, book 3 in the Mollie Fenwick Mystery Series, in progress

 

Men–Fiction or Reality

9318

In class this week we watched a movie about men.  I know what you’re thinking – How awesome is it that  – I get to watch men in class, I’d go to class more often if I got to watch hot sexy men all night.  Hell I’d probably have ten degrees by now instead of working on one.

The movie was about how men are programmed from the time they are children to be tough guys, not whiney, brave, strong, independent, and so on. What they discussed was how this type of treatment to boys leads them to violence or destructive behavior.  It also covered media and sociological influences on their behavior and male interpretation of acceptable actions. 

This got me to thinking – a very dangerous thing sometimes – that as romance writers, or writers in general,how do we portray men in our books? Immediately, I think Alpha male, prince charming, knight in shining armor, or billionaire playboy.  I like the men I write to be strong, a rock, protective, and strong.  I want him to be intelligent, a leader among men, and first and foremost, he must have a buff rippled body. (example of said body above). Ergo I fall right in line with the video and portrayal of men.  Do I as a writer, have a hand in real male behavior.  I didn’t think so.  However, because this type of hero is not uncommon in romance novels, in a way, when I write this type of man and delve into his characteristics, I am helping to  keep this stereotypical image in the minds of women.In turn, some women seek out bits and pieces of heroes they’ve read and try to find those things in men in real life.  It’s a cyclical effect.

A while ago and I can’t remember which author asked this in a blog post – but the author wanted to know a readers take on a virgin hero.  I eye rolled at the absurdity of such a notion.  A man who hasn’t had sex.  No way.  Don’t want to read it and don’t think it’s plausible.  Yet I don’t mind, and I rather like, when my heroine is a virgin.  Why is it so hard to reverse the role based on gender?  It’s the same thing no matter the sex, or rather the lack of sex.  I as a writer am casting men into a specific role, one that is acceptable in society.

Now looking at my own work I see these traditional male characteristics, granted I write historical and these were more prevalent in that time period, because women didn’t have the equality we have now.  I also see that my heroes embrace the feminine influences in their lives.  In Survival of the Fittest, my first completed manuscript, Roderick Witherborne, is a hardened man, a secret agent to an elite crime fighting task force that reports directly to the Queen of England.  He knows men, he knows how to direct troops and train operatives, but a woman in his midst is foreign territory.  When he is forced to marry my heroine, Ainsley, he could be bitter and hateful towards her, he could be cold and distant, he could be violent if he choices or even rough.  Instead, he is kind to her, he takes care of her, and actively tries to be a good husband, even though their marriage was not planned.  I see the sensitive side to him, a gentleness that men often only show their significant other. Although I perpetuate the male image, I also add, what I think, to be a very real and human side to the character. I make his masculinity believable.

So HerStoryCallers, what are your thoughts about the portrayal of men in books?  How does it compare to real life men?  Do you create the ideal man from bits and pieces of your work and others?  Would you read a virgin hero?